How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

For example, Jesus has a God …

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

Have anyone had an relationship of any kind with a spirit or demon, such as a succubus? If so, how was it?

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

My stepdaughter’s mom tells her I’m not a real dance teacher, but my stepdaughter has seen me in action. Why does she still question my abilities?

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

What is the most comfortable heel height for women's dress shoes and what are the differences between wearing high heels and lower heels?

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: